Legal Center

In Alabama, there is a strong emphasis on the upkeep and alert protocols for Automated External Defibrillator (AED) initiatives, ensuring that these life-saving devices are always ready and their distributors are informed of any necessary updates or maintenance. While the state does not mandate CPR and AED training for individuals who may use these devices, it actively promotes such education to enhance emergency response effectiveness. Moreover, to support the widespread adoption and proficient use of AEDs, manufacturers are obligated to include comprehensive training materials with each unit sold. Additionally, Alabama extends Good Samaritan immunity to AED users, providing legal protection that does not hinge on adherence to specific administrative or operational guidelines. Reflecting a commitment to public health and safety, the state mandates the presence of AEDs within K-12 educational settings and assisted living centers, ensuring that these critical environments are equipped to handle cardiac emergencies.

Since August 12, 2015, Alaska has removed all administrative and operational mandates previously placed on AED programs. The state offers Good Samaritan immunity exclusively to individuals who either possess an AED or utilize one during a medical emergency, with the exception of medical directors and trainers. Furthermore, there is no statewide requirement for AEDs to be installed in specific locations.

In Arizona, the Good Samaritan law extends broad immunity to AED programs, covering numerous activities without tying this protection to the adherence to specific administrative or operational protocols. The law also necessitates the installation of AEDs in particular structures, including state buildings and dental practices. Moreover, AED initiatives are obligated to document aspects such as maintenance, medical oversight, emergency medical services engagement, and actual AED utilization.

Arkansas mandates that all AED programs include maintenance, training, reporting on AED placement, and activation of Emergency Medical Services (EMS). Participants in these programs may be eligible for Good Samaritan immunity, which is not contingent upon meeting specific administrative or operational criteria. Furthermore, the state obligates the installation of AEDs in health clubs, select educational institutions, and criminal detention centers.

California enforces regulations that necessitate the upkeep of Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs), along with mandates for their strategic placement and adherence to regulatory standards by AED proprietors. Entities such as building managers, educational heads, and those involved in the manufacturing and retailing of AEDs are obliged to inform occupants about the locations of AED units and available CPR/AED training sessions. Eligibility for Good Samaritan law immunity is contingent upon fulfilling these AED legislative stipulations. The state also prescribes the installation of AEDs in various venues, including fitness centers, newly erected or significantly altered large buildings, public pools, educational institutions with competitive sports programs, and certain commuter rail services, with high schools additionally required to offer CPR instruction.

Colorado mandates comprehensive management for AED programs, encompassing placement reporting, EMS activation, upkeep, training, medical oversight, and thorough documentation. The Good Samaritan law extends immunity to participants within these programs, specifically for actions tied to AED use, excluding other program-related activities. This immunity hinges on adherence to established administrative and operational protocols, and the state also stipulates the installation of AEDs in designated areas.

In Connecticut, there are no specific administrative or operational regulations for AED programs, except for those in educational institutions where AED programs are mandatory. Such school settings are required to maintain, train, report after events, and keep documentation. Good Samaritan immunity is extended to both AED owners and users, excluding situations where trainers or medical directors are operating the device, with immunity not contingent upon adherence to administrative and operational standards. The state also requires AEDs to be available at golf courses, select schools, and health clubs.

Delaware mandates that AED programs include regular maintenance, training, emergency services activation, and reporting of AED usage. Furthermore, AED producers must inform the state’s EMS agency about the locations of deployed AEDs. The Good Samaritan law shields AED owners, users, and CPR/AED trainers, although it doesn’t specifically mention medical directors of AED programs. While users may receive protection solely for AED operation, owners enjoy broader immunity across various program-related activities, independent of strict adherence to administrative or operational guidelines. There are no state-imposed rules on the specific placement of AEDs within Delaware.

Florida mandates that AED programs include maintenance, training, and the requirement to activate Emergency Medical Services (EMS). The Good Samaritan law offers protection to AED owners and users specifically for actions involving or attempting to use an AED, excluding trainers and medical directors. This immunity is contingent on meeting certain administrative and operational criteria. Additionally, the state requires the installation of AEDs in high schools, dental practices, and assisted living facilities.

Georgia mandates that AED programs include regular maintenance, training, notification of AED locations, activation of Emergency Medical Services (EMS), reporting of AED use, and medical oversight. The Good Samaritan law provides immunity for actions directly related to AED use, but not for other aspects of AED program management. This immunity isn’t based on meeting specific administrative or operational standards. Additionally, the state requires the placement of AEDs in designated high schools and facilities where sedation or anesthesia is administered, such as dental and medical offices.

Hawaii does not impose administrative or operational mandates on AED programs. Good Samaritan immunity is granted to participants involved in AED-related activities, excluding other program management tasks. The state also has no specific requirements for placing AEDs in designated locations.

Idaho mandates comprehensive AED program protocols, including device maintenance, user training, strategic placement and reporting, activation of Emergency Medical Services (EMS), and reporting after an event. The Good Samaritan law extends protection to all involved in AED programs, excluding trainers, with immunity not contingent upon adherence to specific administrative or operational guidelines. Furthermore, facilities where sedation or anesthesia is administered must be equipped with an AED.

Illinois mandates that AED programs include upkeep, training, location reporting, emergency services notification, and post-use documentation. Good Samaritan immunity shields AED users and owners, but solely for actions tied to AED operation; other program-related tasks fall outside this protection. This immunity hinges on meeting particular administrative and operational guidelines. Additionally, the state stipulates AED installation in health clubs, law enforcement offices, dental practices, school fitness centers, and horse racing venues.

Indiana mandates that AED programs include maintenance, placement notification, and emergency services activation. The state also requires CPR and AED training for all high school students. Users of AED programs are protected under the Good Samaritan law, with immunity based on adherence to certain administrative and operational guidelines. Furthermore, Indiana stipulates the installation of AEDs in health clubs.

In Iowa, the maintenance of AED programs is necessary for immunity coverage under the Good Samaritan law, which only applies to non-negligent actions. Additionally, the state mandates the installation of AEDs in health clubs.

Kansas mandates that AED programs include regular maintenance and reporting of AED locations. Good Samaritan immunity is extended to participants in AED programs, except when the AED is used for activities unrelated to the program. This immunity depends on adherence to certain administrative and operational guidelines. Additionally, dental practices that employ sedation must have an AED available on site.

Kentucky mandates AED programs to include maintenance, training, medical oversight, location reporting, EMS notification, and post-use documentation. Good Samaritan immunity is granted to participants using the AED for its intended purposes, with other program activities not covered. Immunity relies on adherence to certain administrative and operational protocols. Furthermore, Kentucky requires AEDs at all high school sports events and practices, as well as in dental offices that use sedation and anesthesia.

Louisiana mandates that AED programs include upkeep, training, medical supervision, location reporting, EMS notification, post-use reports, and comprehensive documentation. The Good Samaritan law safeguards all involved in AED use, with immunity not contingent upon specific administrative or operational standards. The state also stipulates that AEDs be available in health clubs, high schools, colleges with sports programs, and densely populated areas.

Maine does not impose specific administrative or operational conditions on AED programs, with the Good Samaritan law providing extensive protection to various AED participants and encompassing all program activities. The state mandates CPR/AED training opportunities for public school students and requires the availability of AEDs across all K-12 grade levels.

In Maryland, comprehensive AED programs encompass registration, maintenance, training, post-event reporting, and program documentation. Compliance with AED law requirements is fundamental to the application of the Good Samaritan law, offering immunity protection solely for AED-related activities. Notably, this immunity does not extend to all other aspects of AED program operations. The state mandates the placement of AEDs in middle and high schools, public swimming pools, and dentist offices. Additionally, beginning in 2024, AEDs will be obligatory in grocery stores and restaurants, further enhancing public safety measures.

In Massachusetts, AED programs are mandated to include maintenance, training, medical direction, placement reporting, EMS activation, and post-event reporting. The Good Samaritan law extends protection to AED owners, users, and medical directors, but not to AED trainers. Immunity under this law isn’t contingent upon compliance with specific administrative and operational requirements. The state also requires AEDs to be installed in various locations, including schools, assisted living facilities, health clubs, and dentist offices. This comprehensive approach aims to ensure swift and effective responses to cardiac emergencies, enhancing public safety across different settings.

In Michigan, AED programs are not subject to any specific administrative or operational requirements. However, high school students are mandated to undergo training in CPR/AED procedures. The Good Samaritan law provides protection to individuals engaged in AED-related activities, but does not extend coverage to other aspects of AED programs. Notably, immunity from liability is not contingent upon compliance with administrative or operational requirements. Furthermore, Michigan mandates the presence of AEDs in health clubs, enhancing safety measures within such facilities.

In Minnesota, there are no specified administrative or operational requirements for AED programs. The Good Samaritan law offers protection to AED users engaged in device-related activities, excluding other program activities. Immunity from liability is not determined by adherence to specific administrative or operational guidelines. Additionally, Minnesota mandates the presence of AEDs in dentist offices, ensuring preparedness for potential cardiac emergencies in such healthcare settings.

Mississippi mandates comprehensive AED programs encompassing training, medical direction, EMS activation, and post-event reporting to ensure preparedness for cardiac emergencies. The state recommends that only trained individuals utilize AEDs. Under the Good Samaritan law, protection is extended to AED users solely when engaged in AED-related activities. Immunity from liability hinges on compliance with specified administrative and operational requirements. Additionally, Mississippi requires the presence of AEDs in gaming establishments and dentist offices, reinforcing safety measures in these environments.

Missouri imposes maintenance regulations on AED programs to ensure their effectiveness. Under the Good Samaritan law, all AED program participants except physician medical directors are protected, but solely for AED-related activities. Immunity from liability is not contingent upon compliance with specified maintenance requirements. Notably, Missouri does not mandate the placement of AEDs in specific locations, leaving discretion to individual entities. This approach aims to balance safety measures with flexibility, allowing organizations to tailor AED deployment based on their unique needs and circumstances.

In Montana, AED programs must adhere to maintenance, training, medical direction, placement reporting, EMS activation, post-event reporting, and program documentation requirements. Additionally, it is recommended that only trained individuals have access to AEDs. Under the Good Samaritan law, protection is extended to all AED users engaged in device-related activities. Immunity from liability hinges on compliance with the state’s AED laws. Furthermore, Montana mandates the placement of AEDs in schools, enhancing preparedness for cardiac emergencies within educational settings. This comprehensive approach aims to ensure effective AED usage and improve emergency response outcomes across the state.

In Nebraska, AED programs are mandated to incorporate AED placement reporting. Under the Good Samaritan law, protection is extended to AED users engaged in device-related activities, while other program activities and participants are not covered. Immunity from liability is not determined by compliance with specified administrative and operational requirements. Notably, Nebraska does not specify the placement of AEDs in particular locations, allowing flexibility in deployment strategies. This approach aims to balance safety measures with organizational autonomy, ensuring that AED programs are effective while accommodating varying needs and circumstances.

Nevada mandates maintenance, EMS activation, and compliance obligations for all AED programs. Specific students are obligated to undergo CPR and AED training. Good Samaritan immunity shields AED owners and users during device-related activities, while other program aspects remain uncovered. Immunity hinges on adhering to specified administrative and operational requirements. Notably, Nevada requires AEDs in airports, high schools, the University of Nevada, and government buildings. This comprehensive approach aims to enhance emergency preparedness and ensure the availability of life-saving interventions across various settings within the state.

AED programs in New Hampshire are mandated to incorporate AED registration, ensuring proper tracking and oversight. Good Samaritan laws provide protection to AED owners and users specifically for AED-related activities, while other program aspects remain uncovered. However, AED owners enjoy a broader scope of covered activities under the law. Notably, New Hampshire requires the placement of AEDs in all dialysis centers, prioritizing access to life-saving equipment in critical healthcare settings.

In New Jersey, AED programs must encompass maintenance, training, medical oversight, AED placement reporting, and EMS activation. Good Samaritan protections apply to AED participants engaged in AED-related activities, while other actions remain unprotected. Immunity hinges on compliance with administrative and operational regulations. AED placement is mandated in various locations including health clubs, K-12 schools, nursing homes, assisted living facilities, trampoline parks, public swimming pools, and bathing beaches.

In New Mexico, AED programs entail various administrative and operational obligations encompassing maintenance, training, oversight, reporting, and documentation. The Good Samaritan law offers protection to AED users engaged in device-related activities, excluding physicians. Compliance with state AED regulations dictates immunity, while specific placement requirements for AEDs are not mandated.

New York mandates stringent requirements for AED programs, encompassing maintenance, training, reporting, and medical oversight. Good Samaritan immunity is primarily available for AED usage, leaving ambiguity regarding other program activities. The law’s clarity concerning protected conduct is lacking. AED placement is mandated in various locations, including specific health clubs, schools, high-occupancy areas, government facilities, bathing beaches, and dental offices.

In North Carolina, AED programs operate without specific administrative or operational mandates. However, AED sellers must report all sales to a state agency. The Good Samaritan law extends protection to AED users engaged in AED-related activities exclusively. Other non-AED related actions are not covered by this law. Notably, North Carolina mandates the presence of AEDs in all dentist offices.

Since March 2017, North Dakota has operated AED donation programs without specific mandates for maintenance, training, medical direction, and program documentation, offering only recommendations. While the Good Samaritan law shields AED participants, it confines protection to activities directly related to AED usage. Other facets of AED programs remain outside this legal safeguard. Notably, North Dakota mandates the presence of AEDs in all schools.

In Ohio, AED programs are mandated to adhere to maintenance protocols, provide training for students and teachers, activate EMS when necessary, and may opt for AED placement reporting. The Good Samaritan law extends protection to all participants involved in AED programs, encompassing both AED use and related activities. AED placement in schools is contingent upon the policies of individual school districts.

In Oklahoma, AED programs are mandated to include AED placement reporting, ensuring strategic deployment across various locations. The Good Samaritan law provides comprehensive protection for individuals engaged in AED-related activities within the state, safeguarding their actions from civil liability. However, activities beyond AED-related functions are not covered under this law. Additionally, Oklahoma enforces the placement of AEDs in educational institutions, particularly in schools, to enhance emergency preparedness and response measures.

Oregon’s regulations do not mandate specific administrative or operational requirements for AED programs. However, students in grades 7-12 must undergo CPR/AED training, contributing to a more prepared community. The Good Samaritan laws offer protection to participants engaged in various AED program activities, ensuring their safety while aiding others. Additionally, Oregon mandates AED placement in schools, colleges, health clubs, large occupancy spaces, camps, and swimming pools, enhancing public access to life-saving equipment.

In Pennsylvania, AED programs must adhere to maintenance, training, EMS activation, and post-use reporting standards. The Good Samaritan law shields AED owners and trained users, though untrained users, CPR/AED trainers, and AED program medical directors are excluded from its protection. Immunity hinges on compliance with administrative and operational requirements outlined in state laws. Pennsylvania mandates AED placement in health clubs, assisted living facilities, and coal mines.

In Rhode Island, there are no specified administrative or operational prerequisites for AED programs. Under the Good Samaritan law, immunity extends to AED owners, proficient AED users, CPR/AED instructors, and medical directors engaged in AED-related tasks. However, untrained AED users are excluded from this protection, and activities unrelated to AED programs are not covered. Rhode Island mandates the placement of AEDs in health clubs, middle and high schools, as well as public venues accommodating 300 individuals or more.

In South Carolina, AED programs mandate maintenance, training, medical oversight, EMS activation, and post-event reporting protocols. The state’s Good Samaritan law extends protection to individuals using AEDs solely for related activities, excluding other program endeavors. Immunity hinges on adherence to specified administrative and operational standards. Additionally, South Carolina mandates the placement of AEDs specifically in high school settings.

In South Dakota, AED programs operate without specific administrative or operational mandates. The Good Samaritan law safeguards AED users and CPR/AED trainers, though AED owners and physicians do not fall under its protection. Immunity under this law is confined to the application or non-application of an AED during a medical crisis, leaving other program activities unprotected. High school students are obliged to undergo CPR and AED training, while the state mandates the placement of AEDs in dental facilities.

In Tennessee, AED programs are mandated to encompass maintenance, training, medical oversight, AED placement reporting, EMS activation, post-event reporting, and program documentation. The Good Samaritan law extends protection to AED owners, users, and CPR/AED trainers, although AED program physicians are excluded from this coverage. Immunity under this law isn’t contingent on adherence to the state’s AED regulations. AEDs are required in public schools statewide, while private schools are encouraged, though not obligated, to have them on-premises.

In Texas, AED programs are mandated to adhere to maintenance protocols, report AED placements, and meet EMS activation standards. The Good Samaritan law extends protection to all AED users, covering various activities. Immunity is not contingent upon compliance with specific administrative and operational requirements. Texas law requires AEDs in specific school settings, dentist offices, nursing homes, extended care facilities, and artificial swimming areas.

Utah mandates AED programs to adhere to placement reporting and registration requirements, ensuring prompt access to life-saving devices. The Good Samaritan law provides comprehensive protection to all AED participants, encompassing various activities. Immunity is not contingent upon meeting specific administrative or operational criteria. Trampoline parks in Utah are required to have AEDs installed, further enhancing safety measures in recreational facilities.

In Vermont, AED programs must adhere to maintenance and AED placement reporting guidelines. While the Good Samaritan law safeguards AED owners, users, and CPR/AED trainers, it excludes AED program medical directors. However, various AED program activities seem to be encompassed. Immunity from the law is not contingent on adherence to specified administrative and operational requisites. Notably, Vermont does not mandate AED placement in specific locations.

In Virginia, AED programs are not bound by any administrative or operational prerequisites. The Good Samaritan law extends protection to all participants involved in AED-related endeavors exclusively, leaving other activities outside its coverage. Immunity under this law isn’t contingent upon adherence to specified administrative or operational criteria. High school students must undergo CPR and AED training before graduation, while the state mandates AED installations in health clubs and dental offices.

In Washington, AED programs must adhere to maintenance, training, medical oversight, placement reporting, and EMS activation protocols. The state’s Good Samaritan law extends protection to participants engaged solely in AED-related activities, excluding other program endeavors. Immunity isn’t contingent upon meeting specific administrative or operational criteria. Additionally, Washington mandates access to AEDs in all dental offices.

In West Virginia, AED programs are subject to various requirements, including maintenance, training, medical direction, placement reporting, EMS activation, post-event reporting, program registration, and more. While the Good Samaritan law safeguards AED program participants during AED-related activities, other actions are not covered under this law. Immunity hinges on adherence to specified administrative and operational requirements. The state mandates AED placement at school athletic events, as well as in underground coal mines, surface mines, and quarries.

In Wisconsin, AED programs must ensure maintenance, especially for non-health club AED programs, while health club staff are mandated to undergo AED training. The Good Samaritan law offers protection to AED owners, users, and trainers, albeit solely for AED-related activities. Notably, medical directors are excluded from this protection, and other AED program activities are not covered. Compliance with maintenance requirements determines immunity under this law, with no specific location mandated for AED placement in Wisconsin.

In Wyoming, AED programs are mandated to adhere to maintenance, training, AED placement reporting, and post-event reporting protocols. The Good Samaritan law safeguards all individuals involved in AED-related activities, while other aspects of AED programs remain unprotected. Immunity under this law hinges on meeting specific administrative and operational criteria. Additionally, dentist offices in Wyoming are obligated to maintain an AED on their premises.